Wonder Boys Wonder Boys directed by ...
At long last, playing Grady Tripp, Douglas sloughs off the carapace of matinee idol glamour and gives a character-actor-as-leading-man performance, comparable to the very best of Nick Nolte and Jeff Bridges. He lets his 55 years show: his long hair is dry and fine and flecked with silver; his gut is clearly visible; his throat is saggy and unshaven; his face is lined and slightly dry, as if liver spots were right around the corner.
I don't know how much of his realistic appearance is due to makeup (or a dearth of makeup), but it doesn't matter; the character of Tripp resists any attempts at glorification. He's a pretty sad, marginal figure?a man coasting on the fumes of past glories, and who thinks the rest of the world doesn't realize how bad off he is. His wife has left him. His third novel, unfinished after several years of toil, is clocking in at more than 2600 pages, and Tripp has no idea how to end the thing. His mistress, university chancellor Sara Gaskell (Frances McDormand), is pregnant with his child. His star creative writing pupil, James Leer (Tobey Maguire), is a mysterious and possibly dangerous person. His editor, Terry Crabtree (Robert Downey Jr.), is in Pittsburgh for the literary festival, known as Word Fest, and he expects delivery of Tripp's long-delayed third novel. Though he brings along an impossibly tall transvestite named Miss Sloviak (Michael Cavadias) whom he met on the plane coming in, he's a charming bisexual smoothie with a roving eye.
But that's more than you need to know about the plot; in fact, almost any amount of description of this film is more than you need to know. One of the delights of Wonder Boys, novel and movie, is its gleeful piling on of incident after incident, twist after twist. Because we're with Tripp most of the time, seeing the world as processed by his slow-moving, introspective, druggy mind, we don't think of the story as being densely plotted. But it is: Tripp is always fretting over two or three potentially catastrophic events, from a waylaid dog to a stolen manuscript to a boosted car to his own bloody, wounded ankle (the result of a mishap I wouldn't dream of giving away here). It's like he's spending the whole movie running to catch a train that just left the station?or, more accurately in Tripp's case, jogging along amiably while trying to light a joint at the same time. There have been a lot of novels in recent years about the college literary scene?inevitable, considering how much of the so-called serious literary establishment has retreated to the hothouse environment of the university?but few have succeeded both as an evocation of a peculiar subculture and as a stand-alone, knockabout comedy. This one has it both ways, and the less you know going in, the more you'll enjoy yourself.
Wonder Boys is about as odd as a Hollywood movie can get and still be a Hollywood movie. Much of the time, it resembles a superb independent film, or perhaps a fine French comedy from the 70s or 80s. It's funky and literate in a stealthy way, dropping casual references to the PEN awards, Gene Tierney, Ernest Hemingway and the takeover of the book business by monolithic entertainment conglomerates, and never troubling itself over whether the audience will know or care what the characters are talking about. "Books," Tripp tells James Leer late in the film. "They don't mean anything to anybody. Not anymore." What sells the line?keeps it from self-pity, makes it emotionally resonant to a general audience?is that the film presumes no knowledge of publishing, writing or the university world, as, say, a Woody Allen film might. Instead, it assumes that we will feel as sad about declining literacy as Tripp does because he's the hero, because the actor has made him worthy of interest and because the film has done a good job of explaining what Tripp cares about and how much it means to him. It's a strategy that would work equally well if Tripp were a burned-out doctor or hockey player or Hollywood actor.
The characters in Wonder Boys have an alertness, an intelligence, a self-aware joie de vivre, but the actors don't play to the back rows. Though the performers, particularly Douglas and Downey, give their juicier lines an unexpected and delightful twist here and there (a strategic pause, a weird emphasis), they're never winking at the audience; they're expressing the self-awareness of these too-smart-by-half characters, but not having a laugh at their expense. Nearly every character in the film could have been boiled down to caricature, yet even the minor ones have a sideways authenticity. They don't exist to be amusing; they exist, and we're permitted to watch and be amused?a fine but crucial distinction.
Vernon Hardapple (Richard Knox), a black barfly with an old car fetish and a 'do that Tripp says could qualify him to be the spokesman for the James Brown Hair Club for Men, might have been a stereotypical weird black man in somebody else's movie. Wonder Boys insists on his uniqueness and humanity from the get-go and, in a fine sequence near the end, allows him to be righteous and unexpectedly tender. Frances McDormand might have been encouraged to lampoon the character of the university chancellor and Tripp's secret lover (imagine how she'd be treated in a Coen brothers movie), but instead she comes off as a fully realized professional woman whose furtive personal life has pushed her into a really bad corner. Burly, satyr-browed Rip Torn floats through the film as a legendary Mailer-esque blowhard writer known only as Q. His youthful gusto, arty pomposity and interest in nubile young female writers are elements on a laundry list of cliches, ticked off one after the other. Yet Torn is permitted to carve out a great character in just a few scenes; he lets us see the intelligence, justified pride and fear of mortality that lurk beneath the facade.
What a triumph for Hanson. This filmmaker spent a decade and a half doing second-tier Hollywood suspense pictures like The Bedroom Window, The Hand that Rocks the Cradle and The River Wild. With L.A. Confidential and Wonder Boys, he moves into the upper ranks of American filmmakers. The subtlety of the latter, contrasted with the brazen stylishness, sensuality and brutality of the former, is instant proof of his versatility. Yet no matter how terrific he becomes, I suspect Hanson will never be given proper credit for his excellence, because he isn't one of those directors whose style says, "Look, ma?I'm directing!" His style achieves precise effects while remaining mostly invisible. Early in the movie, if you listen closely, you'll hear a couple of anonymous guests at a Word Fest party debating the merits of an unnamed film. "How did you feel about the adaptation?" one asks. "I felt it was more literary than cinematic," the other replies. This is Hanson and Kloves' sly way of tossing down the gauntlet; it's like they're daring critics to see the cinematic qualities in what is intentionally a pretty subdued black comedy about a subculture few Americans care about.
This might be the wrong approach. Most critics?indeed, most audience members?will automatically assume a film set against a world of literate people and book worship is literary rather than cinematic. They'd be wrong. With the exception of Tripp's droll, sparing voiceover, Kloves and Hanson find marvelously cinematic ways to convey information. Look at the way Hanson and his cinematographer, Dante Spinotti, photograph the dirty whiteness of the snow on residential Pittsburgh streets, and the wintry rain and sleet that occasionally pelt the beleaguered characters; they've created the first great elemental comedy since Withnail and I.
We don't realize how long Tripp's book is until we see him working on it, putting a fresh sheet of paper in the typewriter, typing "261" at the top of the pages, pausing for a second, then adding another "1." Drinking in a bar with Crabtree and Leer, Tripp looks up to see a waitress (Jane Adams) asking to take their orders; the first thing we see is her name tag, "OOLA," then the camera moves up for a close shot of her slender face. It's only when she moves back, away from the camera to medium distance, drink tray held aloft, that we can see her massively pregnant belly. Douglas' expression in this scene, as elsewhere, is just right; Tripp registers that the image of the pregnant Oola is significant, yet his face suggests he hasn't quite connected it to his own experience.
Is there a place in Hollywood for this kind of movie? I tend to doubt it. Wonder Boys is packed with great actors, but it's not a "package." There are imperfections; it's perhaps 10 minutes too long, and the underscore is a shade too winsome and wacky, like the music in Midnight Run. But scene for scene, it's a sublime achievement.
Mack Daddy. Stephen Holden's review of Pitch Black has an intriguingly Elvis Mitchellesque lead, complete with eye-popping cartoon metaphor. But Holden hilariously destroys it by trying to explain it further down. "With his elephantine glare and trapezius muscles that could support a Mack truck," the review begins, "Vin Diesel, who appears in two films opening today, is definitely the flavor of the movie weekend." Later, he qualifies it: "In the real world, of course, no one's trapezius muscles could actually handle a Mack truck. But the combination of Mr. Diesel's massive shoulders and good-natured sarcasm go a long way toward carrying 'Pitch Black' above the musclebound fray."
Thanks for explaining that, guy; the next time I saw Vin, I was gonna ask him to help move a piano.